On 2014-11-22 Heiko Schlittermann <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > Hm, a configuration file that is better readable is always a gain. A > complex configuration is not always read or maintained by an expert.
Hello, Well, for me personally distinguishing private router options does not increase readability. If I set a option I need to understand what it does and why I want it. The information that it is specific to the redirect router or would apply to ipliteral router does not interest me a lot. But that is really just me personally, so I do not think it should count for much in the discussion. OTOH I have pretty good idea that renaming the option and dropping the old name would cause loads of work for many people in the distribution context (Debian). BTW: Do we currently have router options that do not apply to all routers but are shared by at least two of them? cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
