https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1708
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #1) [...] > "armel" ? Is this a processor architecture/model - if so, what endianness > and does it support misaligned accesses? Hello, armel is little-endian (More details here: https://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort ), the handling of misaligned accesses seems to be configurable but fgive garbled results by default: https://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiFixes#word_accesses_must_be_aligned_to_a_multiple_of_their_size >> a rewriting rule is found > How does the Exim config make use of the /etc/email-addresses file? > Is this a rewrite in Exim terminology, per Chapter 31 of the spec? > If so, since it sounds reproducible, can we get a debug run including at > least "rewrite" and "expand" options (plus any others felt relevant)? Yes, this is exim rewriting: -------------------- *@+local_domains "${lookup{${local_part}}lsearch{/etc/email-addresses}\ {$value}fail}" Ffrs # identical rewriting rule for /etc/mailname *@ETC_MAILNAME "${lookup{${local_part}}lsearch{/etc/email-addresses}\ {$value}fail}" Ffrs -------------------- I will ask the bug submitter to add the missing reponses directly here. cu Andreas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
