On 20/12/15 17:06, Richard Clayton wrote:
> I assume, BTW, that the lack of ORing in the second value breaks something
> somewhere, so there's test case(s) missing as well :-(

Contributions always welcome.
-- 
Jeremy



-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to