https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1919
Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- Use of _DH_H_ is deliberate as can be seen from the comments. While we could invent yet another preprocessor identifier for a guard to explicitly lock out the system db.h inclusion I'm not convinced it is worthwhile. __SRS_H__ is not reserved as it does not begin with an underbar followed by a letter. Thus it is legitimate for application source code use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
