https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2145
Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED QA Contact| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- The above addresses the pointer being initialiased to one before the buffer, which so far as I can tell is what the attachment is describing. There wasn't actually a use of the pointer at that place in the code, so I'd argue with the description "underflow" for that code location (but the pointer could have gotten used later). I don't see any "overflow"; please explain what you mean by that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
