> On Apr 17, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Phil Pennock <p...@exim.org> wrote:
> 
> I agree the spec shows we can argue it's not required, but the spec also
> allows recipients to argue that it is required.
> 
> This came up because, today, Google's servers are responding to TLS1.3
> connections which don't send SNI with a self-signed certificate which
> has DN:
> 
>  OU=No SNI provided; please fix your client., CN=invalid2.invalid
> 
> So Google are telling sending systems that they're broken and need to be
> fixed.  I saw that string in my MTA logs and went investigating.

Which Google servers are these?  Are they MX hosts for some domains???
If so, I need to tell Google urgently to cease and desist, this is
wrong.

-- 
        Viktor.


-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to