https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2267
--- Comment #1 from Mike Brudenell <[email protected]> --- PS. I've just returned to the Specification yet again (to try and decide which other per_XXX I should be using instead of per_mail in setup described. Despite having read the section umpteen times I've just now noted that the "per_mail" option "can be used in acl_smtp_mail, acl_smtp_rcpt, acl_smtp_predata, acl_ smtp_mime, acl_smtp_data, or acl_not_smtp" This does not mention acl_smtp_quit or acl_smtp_notquit, so it might be it is not valid to use "per_mail" there at all, in which case I'd hope/expect: 1) Exim would warn or panic an error saying that "per_mail" had been used in an ACL it shouldn't be, and 2) Exim shouldn't default to using "per_mail" when that option isn't valid for an ACL. (But perhaps, with the potential for one ACL to call another, this would be complicated to implement?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
