https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- We used to do a new TLS conn for every message, within a continued SMTP conn. To the extent that still holds, the multi-domain changes in the proposed coding might not be needed. On the other hand, I spent some time adding support for continued-TLS conns (cf. 875512a361) and use of multi-domain vs. a $domain value of SNI needs to consider that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
