https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423
--- Comment #12 from Simon Arlott <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #11) > Using a warn verb will only log an additional warning if you put a logging > modifier on it, so I don't understand your "not only" point. No, it logs on any warn verb that defers. There is no message or log_message on it. > With your final, eventual, defer verb you get the opportunity to use logging > modifiers; it sounds like you are not currently doing that. > > Having the actual original verify-fail message in a variable is a valid > request, > but given that you can log exactly what you want explicitly I don't see a > high priority. Is there some information that is hard to reconstruct? Yes, the user message is impossible to reconstruct. You're giving me two mutually exclusive options: 1. Return the default verify user message in the SMTP response 2. Log anything I want (excluding the user message, but that's not essential) > See also bug 251 for making verify-defers separately visible. I'm doing this. As noted, it generates a warning. What it fails to point out is that the verify message that used to get sent over SMTP is now no longer sent and you get a default generic message instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
