https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Kurz <m.k...@irregular.at> --- > Could you supply a comment (for the first patch) with the rationale for > raising the event in the new place and not the old? If I remember correctly not all (failed) messages reach the failure_log(...) function (Which itself is called by post_process_one(...)). Some failed messages "stop" sooner and don't even execute post_process_one(...). That's why I had to raise the event (for ignored errors) earlier. And to avoid duplicate events I had to add the new "if (!addr->prop.ignore_error)" condition in the original place within the failure_log(...) function (because obviously the event was fired already). Does that answer your question? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
