https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2336
--- Comment #2 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #1) > Created attachment 1163 [details] > proposed patch > > I had to assume the command-string format. > Not being an rspamd user, I can't test this. If somebody could, we should > gain enough confidence to commit it. Hi Jeremy. I haven't tested the patch yet, but I've skimmed through it and have one comment. As far as I can tell, with the patch, the Deliver-To header will always be sent to Rspamd, even for the typical "spam = nobody:true" case (Deliver-To = nobody). Correct? If so, that'll be a possibly undesired change in behaviour for folks that prefers the current behaviour where Rspamd takes care of deducing the username from the e-mail contents itself (which happens when no explicit username is communicated using the Deliver-To header). Not sure how to best handle that. Maybe handle "nobody" specially and omit the Deliver-To header, but at the same time it feels like a cop-out as "nobody" could very well be a valid username. Tore -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
