On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:


Jeremy Harris <jgh146...@wizmail.org> changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
        Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
          Assignee|ni...@exim.org              |jgh146...@wizmail.org
            Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146...@wizmail.org> ---
This is a matter for choosing compiler switches to avoid doing such static
analysis.  We refuse to endlessly chase such things by using more-and-more
convoluted coding.  Even the cast-to-void could be regarded as such an
attempt, but it least its heritage goes back over thirty years.

This patch makes the code clearer,
and makes it explicit that we know what we are doing.
If it makes that the compiler happy at the same time,
then we can leave the switches set in a way that helps us avoid writing new bugs.

I agree that this is not the time to put this fix into the next release,
but we could have a general code cleanup bug depend in this for the
next code clean up.

Andrew C. Aitchison                                     Cambridge, UK

## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to