https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895
Phil Pennock <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group| |exim-security --- Comment #12 from Phil Pennock <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #11) > If so, assuming the p for a parameter has been chosen as a "safe prime", > q is entirely dependent on p - which we have from the PEM representation. > Why do we care about loading q? FWIW: I have no idea. I almost knew, once, when Viktor explained it before. This again is part of why I try to stick to using crypto-engineering, not crypto policy, and defer to experts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
