https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2349
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- July 2011: RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic: - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6331 -------------------------------------------------------------- "When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]". Can you add support for? - SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS): -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802 -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120 - SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS): -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 since 2015-11-02 -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8600 since 2019-06-21: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/suJMmeMhuAOmGn_PJYgX5Vm8lNA I add SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS): https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html Linked to: - https://github.com/scram-xmpp/info/issues/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
