https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Galaganov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #5) > OK. This demands a bit of shuffling in the implementation, but feels > feasible. A forced-fail won't be required, just a zero-length result > for the expansion. > Yes, zero-length result is fine here, if this doesn't mess too much with existing expectations. > A wider-coverage alternative would be a fallback-transport, but that would > be far more invasive. > Indeed. > On running using modified code in Exim - I trust you realize that this > destroys any assumptions about how Exim operates, and thereby makes > support a random affair and possibly a total time-waster. We are way past the point of requesting any support for this upstream. :) Occasionally though I stumple upon something that may affect or be mildly useful for others, hence the wishlist ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## [email protected] ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
