On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Dickenson, Steven wrote: > There's been some discussion of late on the SpamAssassin mailing list > about spamd memory usage skyrocketing for Exim users. The current > thinking is that the persons reporting this problem are not checking > (and thus limiting) the size of messages being sent to spamd. I noticed > that the spam ACL examples in the 4.5 spec don't include (or even > mention) size checks. Is it possible to get this added to avoid > confusion?
Noted. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
