On 1 Jun 2005 at 18:50, Daniel Lafraia wrote about
    "[exim] condition failure":

|...
| Later in the transport I'll implement something
| to reply to the sender

How do you propose to ensure that the sender address isn't some 
innocent third party whose address was forged by the spamware/malware 
sending the message?

| with a "double checker" (a webpage that will
| release the message and add the sender automatically to whitelist).

Challenge/Response systems are abusive spam amplifiers.  If you 
succeed in implementing it, you're just asking to get your own server 
blacklisted.

<http://tardigrade.net/challengeresponse.html>

- Fred





-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to