Craig Jackson wrote: > That's absurd. Try a homemade box with Exim-Clamav-Spamassassin and > greylisting. You'll get the same results. Craig
Agreed. In addition, you may not have your SA install tweaked very well. Out of the box, SA is just average IMO. Ensure that you're using network tests, URIBL, and some add-in rule sets. In addition, a well trained Bayes database will go a long way in improving your catch rates. Finally, if you want to implement greylisting, I'd look at SA-Exim. It uses a form of condition greylisting, so that you can greylist emails that MIGHT be spam, but scores to low for rejection. Our users begin to complain about being bombarded with spam when they get 2 or 3 emails a week in their inbox. They're so used to our system protecting them from the other 300 or so that don't get through each day (yes, we're a low volume shop). - S -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
