On 6/6/05 6:55 AM, "V. T. Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, I'm quite p****d about folks using greylisting in a way > that SMTP callbacks are rendered useless: we reject mail temporarily > since the callback is deferred by greylisting at the sending site. > Due to a[nother] broken setup there, their enduser doesn't get > informed about the non-delivery. No second delivery is attempted > from the remote site. My question now is: is there a way I can make > exim overcome this situation? Maybe delaying the incoming SMTP in > order to shoot off a second callback attempt after a while, hoping > that bl**dy greylisting became satisfied in the meantime? We do normal greylisting at RCPT TO: time, but defer <> and a couple of other possible callout senders until DATA time (which is never reached for a proper callout). This is code we wrote ourselves (a Python daemon) since there wasn't anything stable when we decided on greylisting. --John -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
