On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Fred Viles wrote: > > Was there possibly a line consisting of '.' following the "Test > message" line in the original message? > > Is it possible Exchange is not dot-stuffing the message body?? Seems > hard to believe, but it would explain it. >
It's not hard to believe, at all. As I understand it, Exchange on NT 4.0 (whatever version of exchange it is, I forget), originally shipped with dot-stuffing[1] busted. [1] I assume by 'dot-stuffing', you mean prepending a '.' to any lines that start with a '.', so the receiving MTA can strip the extra '.' -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
