On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 14:23 -0400, Dave Lugo wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Do you even need that much? I have a lot of virtual users that > > > > > have nothing more than an aliases entry and a dir that spamd finds > > > > > by virtue of it running with: > > > > > > > > > > --virtual-config-dir=/var/exim/userprefs/%d/%l/sa > > > > > > > > > > %d = domain > > > > > %l = localpart > > > > > > > > Interesting - how do %d and %l make it from Exiscan to spamd? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at section 4.2 in spec.txt. > > > > 4.2 Multiple machine architectures and operating systems > > > > > Are you looking at exim's spec.txt? Section 40.2 shows as "Scanning > with SpamAssassin" in both the 4.50 and 4.51 versions I'm looking > at.
OK, section 40, the Exiscan docs. So in the example above, do the %d and %l get substituted at scan time with values passed from the spam= line? Or just the %d from the username passed? Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1296 768003 VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
