| > As discussed yesterday, the fundamental problem is many sites | > will accept your mail (2XX) and then deliver it into a spam | > folder, which the user may or may not read in a timely manner, | > or indeed, at all. You have no way of knowing if this has | > happened. | | These people are breaking the rules, and eventually all of their | mail will end up in the trash
I agree - I generally prefer rejecting over spam-foldering. However, many other sites think otherwise, and their securiy policy overrides "rules". | bandwidth: once out from dynamic IP, once in to server, and once | out from server. Unlike yours, our packets have to walk through | the valley of the shadow of monopoly telecoms. Well, it's not all *that* long since we paid for transatlantic bandwidth at 2 pence per megabyte ;-)) -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
