On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 16:08 -0500, Craig Jackson wrote: > But my impression is that one of the prime reasons for greylisting is to > avoid the high cost of virus and spamscanning. According to my logs, > greylisting stops a huge percentage of spam before the recipient check. > If mail is spam-scanned then greylisted, is it spam-scanned again when > it is resent?
In my case, yes -- it's not used as a tactic for load reduction. If that's what you want then I suppose it does make some sense to do it before DATA, yes. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
