On 17/06/05, Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:35:15AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Come on Greg, you don't recognize the results of an acl by now? This is > > not by any means default behavior. I'm sorry their behavior offends, > > but I'm not sure what you think this has to do with exim, besides > > "It's so flexible, you can break the rules". > > Wow I can't believe I'm sticking up for Greg, but I think he's right. > Ok so his message might not be *completely* on topic, but if someone is > so blatantly going to violate RFC, they need to be universally > riddiculed and blocked.
I don't disagree. But don't treat the tool they chose to use as the culprit. > Some of us RELY on sender callouts to help reduce spam. Lunarpages have > effectively said they support spammers on their systems. Then block them. Report them to rfc-i. But leave Exim alone! Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1296 768003 VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
