On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 10:56 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > The thing to realise is that dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is purely factual; how > people use its information (causing email to be accepted or rejected) is > up to them. It isn't actually very effective because its coverage is too > patchy. If you want a callback whitelist you are better off with the > /use_postmaster option instead. > Hello,
Curious about the last statement there. The manual says 'use_postmaster' is for recipient callouts (callforward) only. Yet, surely use of rfc-ignorant.org is for sender callouts (callback)? John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
