Sam Michaels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mo 27 Jun 2005 04:18:53 CEST): > Either way, qpopper is what I use. Source is really easy to follow so > some quick hacks are easy.
I had bad experience with qpopper and *huge* mbox files. cucipop
performed better, much better. And it's source is straight forward as
well (e.g. I hacked in some POP-before-SMTP-Support.)
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
