On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Michael Haardt wrote: > > Commercial MTAs have demonstrated they can work with less > than one disk transfer per message,
In order to do that you have to use a single process (threaded or event-driven) server which is WAY different from Exim :-) > Ok, so you think the queue is not the largest bottleneck? That may well > be true in your environment. In mine, it is. Are you sure it's the queue and not the hints DBs? Are you using a ram disk for them? Have you set no_message_logs? Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
