On Jun 29, 2005, at 12:35 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
At least a good portion is sent so widely that one user's spam is
similar
to another users spam.
True, but you're forgetting that there are two sets to each
user. Spam
and ham. While spam is generally going ot be a constant across
users the
likelihood of ham being constant is not.
No, just that it seems on our systems, ham is no longer all that
important. (After the initial setup 2 years ago where a ton of ham
was fed in...) I feed in 100-300 spams for every ham that gets fed
in, almost all of it from my own receipt across 4-6 accounts I have.
I get some from some of the smarter (technically) customers once in a
while. But feedback from customers is that the spamassassin gets
very very few false positives or negatives. What I do do is feed in
ALL spam back as spam again to reinforce it and only feed in the
false positives as ham and occasionally a few other things while I am
at it and just copy a few random good mails out of my inboxes....
It turns out to work very well
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
