> Which means, to anyone who understands English, that you have to have a > pretty good reason to emit null-reverse-path mail for any reason other > than the standards-track RFC (all of which, to my knowledge, are based on > reverse paths of incoming messages).
It's advisable to do sender callouts with a null-reverse-path. At the moment we do sender callouts and reject every message which can't be verified by a callout. But by reading this thread I arrive at the conclusion that I'll better disable all denies which are based on sender callouts. - oliver -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
