On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, .|MoNK|Cucumber . wrote: > I personally agree with the invalidity of disclaimers to a certain > extent. However the company determines the corporate standards and I > have to abide by those. They demand disclaimers on all outbound > emails.
[...] > The reason behind it is so that if you by mistake email a document > to an invalid recipient, at least you have mentioned that if you are > not the intended recipient to delete it, and not to forward it on. If I receive such a mail, then as far as I am concerned I *am* the intended recipient, and anyway my own policy overrules any policy that there might be stated in the mail. But as you say, there's no point in arguing over this piece of sillyness by your lawyers. > My ignorance is with Exim only, I'm new to it. So read the archive of the mailing list where this has been discussed to death already, with several recipes for achieving basically what they say they want, but forget any idea of trying to impose a font and size - even if you send HTML, then anyone with any sense of email security is going to read plain text, and ignore anything called out from the HTML. Yes, a policy at your of requiring a .signature file from all senders is certainly one way of dealing with the situation, and seems to be the only viable way of sending properly-signed mail without it getting corrupted by your mailer on its way out. But if that's not a concern to those legal idiots, then there *are* other ways, implemented under the scope of exim, and I'm sure they'll be in the archives. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
