Finally got around to putting the code up there :) http://sourceforge.net/projects/eximdsn/ -Andy-
> -----Original Message----- > From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 4:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [exim] RFC3461 > > Hi !! > > I'm insterested in such this patch, where can i get it ? > > En/na Andrew Johnson ha escrit: > > If anybody is slightly interested, I have a patch for Exim that > > handles DSN support for remote deliveries. It can even > support unseen > > routers by allowing you to state which router the DSN > should go down. > > (We have patched up to 4.24 - 4.41 with it, and I'm just working on > > the 4.51 version of the > > patch) > > > > It lacks 2 things :- > > It doesn't produce a DSN if you didn't give it any routers > to go down, > > and it doesn’t produce a DSN if it's a local delivery (For the > > complexities that Phillip states - though it is something I > will be adding). > > > > There is a sourceforge project for it though I have not put > any code > > (or anything else for that matter) up there yet. > > > > The patch is on our system that handles ~250k emails per > day (where a > > reasonable proportion actually use it) so we consider it to > be well tested. > > > > -Andy- > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Philip Hazel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 3:17 PM > >>To: pimplebutt > >>Cc: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [exim] RFC3461 > >> > >>On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, pimplebutt wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On 7/4/05, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, pimplebutt wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Does Exim implement support for RFC3461? > >>>> > >>>>It does not. > >>> > >>>That's unfortunate. :-\ Would like to wishlist this if no-one has > >>>wishlisted it already. > >> > >>It's been on the Wish List (as a reference to RFC 1891) for seven > >>years. > >>Nobody has had enough enthusiasm to tackle it. I myself have never > >>been at all keen. > >> > >>I haven't read 3461, so things may be different, but this > is what is > >>in the Wish List: > >> > >>-------------------------------------------------------------- > >>---------------- > >> > >>(11) 17-Jul-98 G support for DSN > >> > >>It is unclear to me how this should work in the presence of aliases > >>and forwarding. Local deliveries would have to explicitly > configured > >>as deliveries or relaying or whatever. > >>A substantial amount of code is probably needed. > >> > >>An Exim user commented: > >>I have nothing to add except to say that for many of the reasons > >>you've stated, I don't think that DSN is coherent enough to > be worth > >>the effort to implement. > >> > >>Another comment: > >> > >> I thought the RFC was pretty clear on this. In a nutshell, if the > >> delivery rewrites the envelope from address, it's considered a > >> terminal delivery (i.e. delivery to a mailing list exploder), > >>otherwise > >> treat it as a forwarding operation (the /etc/aliases > case). I would > >> treat a .forward expansion as a final delivery event (it > got to the > >> user as far as the MTA is concerned). > >> > >> Yes, we need the DSN syntax. We also require the complete > semantics > >>of > >> NOTIFY=SUCCESS,FAILURE for our application to work. > >> > >> Electronic Bill Presentment is really going to push the need for > >> DSN support in MTAs. We just don't want to get stuck in a > situation > >> where we're faced with a non-DSN-aware MTA when we go to install > >> our bill/statement engine, thus our interest in what the > MTA vendors > >> are planning to do about DSN. > >>-------------------------------------------------------------- > >>---------------- > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. > >>Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Salu-2 y hasta pronto ... > > It's a fine line between fishing & standing still > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es > On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75 > 08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: > 06/07/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.10/43 - Release Date: 06/07/2005 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
