Hi I am using a Greylisting system, partially taken from other solutions on the web and partially constructed myself. As the system is running, I see more and more different mailing systems using different VERP addresses. Those are not really a problem for the Greylisting system, but need some fine-tuning.
I define rules for those sender addresses to rewrite them to a common form. Thinking others do the same, I want to share my rules and ask for yours: s/^(.*)-return-\d+-.*=.*\@(.*)$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; # [EMAIL PROTECTED] s/^sentto-(\d+)-\d+-\d+-.*\@(.*)$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; # [EMAIL PROTECTED] om s/^srs0=....=..=(.*)=(.*)\@(.*)$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@$3/; # [EMAIL PROTECTED] s/^direct-mmapi2\.[a-z0-9]+-(.*)=(.*)\@(.*)$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@$3/; direct-mmapi2.giydgmbwgu2c23lnmfygsmromj2wy2zoonrtk-isca01=mannlich-gymnasiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] s/^bounce-\d+-(\d+)\@(.*)$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/; # [EMAIL PROTECTED] They are given as perl regular expression patterns. The next lines give examples. Regards, Steffen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
