I'm agree with V.T. Muller ;)
C'est la vie
jonathan ;)
V. T. Mueller wrote:
Mark Smith schrieb:
[..]
"For your information, our external IT advisers have now adjusted the
settings on our server to prevent a recurrence of the issue that you
raised
- although in their view your comments were pedantic in the extreme
and no
similar concerns were raised by any other of the recipients of our
email."
So there's an IT company out there that thinks it's "extremely
pedantic" to
expect mailservers not to ignore 550 errors.
I really wish there was a way to keep people like this off the
Internet. Or
was I indeed just being "extremely pedantic"?
No, you were not extremely pedantic. It's always the same story: company
A orders company B for service C because they don't want to hire someone
for the job permanently. In fact, A don't really want to spend much
money for C. So it's likely that B does a rather dirty job.
Now you come in and tell A there's s/th broken in C. Then A will ask B.
Just wonder what B will tell - "sorry I made a lousy job"? B will tell A
exactly what you report above.
Smile about it, forget it, and enjoy the weekend!
Cheers,
vt
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
