On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Jakob Hirsch wrote: > NOT (a OR b) = (NOT a) AND (NOT b) > > On the subject: I think you are right, they are functionally equivalent.
Looks like it. I had ignored the "nots" when I gave my general answer. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
