Marc,

you got it. 

> You missed a subtlety in the OPs condition -- the inner and has 
> {no}{yes}, implying that he acutally intended a nand between those two 
> conditions, not an and.  So:
> 
>                 { !and \
> 
> should work for you.  If that still fails (which would be a genuine exim 
> bug), try replacing !and{{eq...}{match...}} with or{{!eq...}{!match...}}.

thank you very much for that hint, it works.

Jakob, also thak you for the tips how to write clean conditions.

regards Martin
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
  Air conditioned environment - Do not open Windows.
----------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to