On 24/08/05, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 16:05 +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > > Umm. SPF will do MUCH better and will not give false positives > > > > You're new here, aren't you.... > > Evidently. Otherwise he'd know better, and/or have already been referred > to either something like http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html or > just to RFC2821 and a large cup of coffee.
I would have thought that applying SPF (or Sender ID) to just the list of domains that Marc listed would be a reasonably good solution, assuming those organisations were publishing SPF records. regards, John -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
