On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > Quite apart from the bogus nature of most of this post and a lack of > understanding of how the system as a whole works, it seems to me that > you're missing a crucial bit of info in understanding how spammers deal > with those fun OCR fonts.
There has also been recent research that shows computers will soon be at least as good as people at solving the current generation of CAPTCHAs. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
