I didn't CC, however I would prefer a CC on reply. Tony Finch wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Wakko Warner wrote: > > > > How difficult would it be to detect this and act like tls-on-connect? > > It's heavily dependent on network delays and client speed. The server > would have to delay its initial banner for a few seconds so that it > doesn't disrupt the SSL negotiation. This would slow down STARTTLS message > submission and it would be unreliable. Generally a bad idea.
I thought about that as I sent it. I suppose the connection messages would confuse the tls-on-connect client and wouldn't work any way. I've never tried that, so I don't know. If it could be done w/o problems it might not be a bad idea so long as it's always the same init string. I'm thinking of this in technical terms only (instead of it being good/bad idea). -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
