On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Fred Viles wrote: > On 3 Sep 2005 at 11:56, Ted Cooper wrote: > >... > > To the RFC's! > >... > > However, where CFWS occurs in this standard, it MUST NOT be inserted > > in such a way that any line of a folded header field is made up > > entirely of WSP characters and nothing else. > > Interesting. So it seems arguable that exim should not have > interpreted the <CRLF><space><CRLF> as a valid header continuation > line. Since it is also not a valid header first line, it should have > signaled the end of the headers, and been treated as the first > message body line.
This is one of the little points where RFC 2822 is stricter than RFC 822 (see appendix B of 2822). I note also that a successor to 2822 is in the works. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
