+1 for Debian
~viraj. On 9/20/05, Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giuliano > > Wouldn't use Fedora as the update cycle is too much (every 3 months) and > I've lots of problems with busy filesystem problems on FC - ie FC is not an > enterprise solution, too bleeding edge. > > I'd say Debian, the apt-get system is more ports like but suse ia a good > alternative. > > Out of interest why not FreeBSD? > > -- > Martin Hepworth > Snr Systems Administrator > Solid State Logic > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Giuliano Gavazzi > Sent: 20 September 2005 01:23 > To: Mailinglist EXIM > Subject: [exim] which linux for exim > > I am going run a server on a virtual hosting facility and am forced > to use some flavour of Linux. > The options are: > > - Linux Fedora > - Debian 3.1 > - SuSE Linux 9.2 > > which one in your opinion is easier to configure the usual (for me) > way as I am used to install packages with configure (if required, not > the case of exim) and then make, etc. I must say that I am not > impressed by the number of problems raised on this list in the past > by Debian users, but does that just mean that Debian is popular or > that they used outdated packages...? > > My personal preference would have been FreeBSD as I have some > experience with it (and indirectly as a MacOSX administrator). If > anyone has knowledge of a virtual hosting facility in Italy > supporting it please email me off list. > > Thanks > > Giuliano > > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/ > > > ********************************************************************** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept > for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. > > ********************************************************************** > > > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/ > -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
