On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:50:55PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: >> On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:45, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> Quite frankly desktop machines shouldn't have SMTP servers on them >>> at all. > I'd be interested in any definition of a desktop where an SMTP > server would be a requirement and not a "nice thing to have" in lieu > of some alternative for bad behaving utilities that can't manage the > failure of the SMTP server be it local or remote. Why should everyone reimplement a queue instead of just one program implementing a queue on the machine? If the user wants to flush the queue, why should he have to track the many different queues instead of having just one to look at? -- Lionel -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
