On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:42:38PM -0400, Marc Sherman said:
> OpenMacNews wrote:
> >    "Clamd does not seem to unpack MIME containers, so it is recommended 
> >to unpack MIME
> >    attachments in the MIME ACL"
> 
> Like the demime option, that statement about clamav is obsolete.  Clamav 
> does a pretty good job at unpacking mime containers these days.
> 
> - Marc

<clamav maintainer hat on>
yes and no, is my advice to you.  clamav uses external libraries (libz,
libbz, etc) to assist with some parts of the unpacking.  If libz can't
unpack a zip file (and libz only unpacks one type of zip file out of at
least 9 or 10 known types), then clamav won't either.  If it's OK with
you to temp fail messages because of that, then I'd say rely on clamav -
all of the other types at this point are probably viral, and it's not a
bad decision to make.  If you feel you have to be more cautious, then
wish that exim was keeping the demime facility :(
</hat>

Take care,
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Stephen Gran                  | What passes for optimism is most often  |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]             | the effect of an intellectual error.    |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | -- Raymond Aron, "The Opium of the      |
|                                | Intellectuals"                          |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to