> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What is the thinking on "helo_allow_chars = _" -- other
> than "I want
> > to receive their email" is there a reason to accept or reject such?
>
> It's purpose is to allow certain exceptions (like _) to the
> RFC allowed helo characters.
>
> This was you can allow _ but still disallow other prohibited
> characters that are usually the hallmark of spamware.
Sorry, I meant the question the other way around:
Do most people think that accepting _underscore is
useful approach? Trouble?
I searched my logs for this entire month and found NO other
case where the _underscore appeared and the sender was not
a spambot etc.
And FYI, the westlake case turned out to be a "return
receipt requested"; apparently my user was communicating
with them just fine in all other respects but had I not
"known" the company/user in question this mail would have
been an 'obvious' forgery/bot:
HELO (with underscore) didn't match REVERSE
Sender was not even in a RELATED domain/zone
In any case, thanks: Problem resolved and I learned
to check for these syntactically invalid HELOs.
--
Herb Martin
>
>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
