On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Wakko Warner wrote: > > > > Blocking using per user prefs before DATA isn't terribly difficult, > > it's when you start rejecting at end-of-DATA that it gets to the > > No Easy Answer. > > How about a fake reject in data acl if some users do not want the message and > some do that states the users who the message did not get delivered to? I > haven't thought it out enough to know if it's a good idea or not. And of > course some servers/clients will butcher the message to mean something else. >
Where I may go, is post-bounce the rejection(s) instead, but only in limited cases (blowback is something I'd like to try to avoid). It does get much easier if you can limit the rcpt_to count to '1'. On my home vanity domains, I do so, and it's not a problem. I doubt that such a limit would be appropriate for larger domains. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
