>Obviously so. So, is it as easy as to add a host = ! statler in the ACL in question?
>Leaving aside the wisdom of rejecting based on SPF, yes. Yes, I know. But a customer wants it. One of the few who actually pays me for the access. >BTW, I hope statler is applying the same (or more) rejection criteria >to incoming mail as scooter. Yes, it has even more checks then scooter.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
