Fred Viles wrote: > On 8 Oct 2005 at 16:55, Wakko Warner wrote about > "Re: [exim] My IP in smtp transport?": > > | This is also directed to Phil as well. I read the responses and I feel this > | message would suffice to respond to all of them > > Not quite, at least to my understanding. You didn't acknowledge > Philips mention of using the interface option in the smtp > transport(s).
Yea, Sorry. That's what I meant by using -D on the command line to set the source host. > So I have to guess that that isn't helpful because you have reason to > not want to exercise control over which interfaces are used for which > outgoing messages? I wanted it in the routing table so that I could also use telnet or other tools to that destination. I have not dismissed using interfaces as an option. > Do you have multiple default routes? If not, I think you could > combine your knowledge of the routing table with the destination host > address to infer which interface will be used. I didn't think of it that way, but yes, that could be done. Thanks for the tip. I really need everything destined for those IPs in a sand box on that box, it has a local network address and loopback is set to listen for the /25 I have, my firewall routs the /25 just to the local lan so I can move the /25 to any machine I want w/o much configuration. Until then, I'll live with the goofy way the network is configured =) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Got Gas??? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
