Mandi! Fred Viles In chel di` si favelave... > | The only time you want to use no_verify is if you need to do something > | different when verifying as opposed to when delivering. This is almost > | never necessary. > I thought it was almost always necessary when using a smarthost. > Since the smarthost router normally accepts everything non-local, it > is useless for verifying.
True, and i think this is my first cause of misunderstood. But also i need to enable verifying for non-internal addess in ACL and... > Right, in this case I think he needs a verify-only dnslookup router > to verify the addresses that will be routed to the smarthost. ...add that. But i'm not in so high volume traffic, so i've deliberatly disabled verifying for smarthosts, i've only take many cares not to make unuseful bounces, simply ignoring all threats (spam, virus, ...) that came from my external gateway. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.sv.lnf.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà , 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) gaio(at)sv.lnf.it tel +39-0434-842711 fax +39-0434-842797 Grazie parlamento europeo! http://punto-informatico.it/p.asp?i=53925&r=PI -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
