I think I figured out what caused this. I created a new filter router
and I copied an existing file and then edited it. It was only in that
state for a few seconds and wasn't supoosed to be active by I think a
cron job restarted exim at the same time. The message was rejected at
the time I was doing this. Makes me wonder what else I rejected because
if what I think happened - it would have rejected everything.
John W. Baxter wrote:
On 10/13/05 8:07 AM, "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to do this verification:
verify = reverse_host_lookup
except I want it to fail only if the lookup returns no host but pass if
it is just misconfigured. Is there a way to do that?
Marc, your spam filtering blocked my attempt to reply directly, so I'll use
the list after all. The Bounce contains my answer near the bottom.
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software at Junk
Email Filter dot com. If this email was rejected in error, please let us
know.
The message from "John W. Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was rejected by
server newton.ctyme.com on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:46 -0700
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients.
The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry - you can't send spam from this server. Your spam has been
intercepted and bocked!
====== This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ======
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from entiat.olympus.net ([65.117.224.69])
by newton.ctyme.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1EQ54X-0000ZR-9X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:45 -0700
Received: from LoricaMail on entiat.olympus.net ([172.21.2.55]
helo=entiat.olympus.net)
by entiat.olympus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EQ54T-0002nj-LY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:41 -0700
Received: from fox.olympus.net ([65.117.226.74]:63778 helo=[172.27.38.5])
by entiat.olympus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EQ54D-0002lh-Tc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:26 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [exim] verify = reverse_host_lookup - variation?
From: "John W. Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thread-Topic: [exim] verify = reverse_host_lookup - variation?
Thread-Index: AcXQC08Wjca8njv+EdqVqwAwZfjYPg==
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Virtual-Service: OlympusNet
X-Exim-Id: 1EQ54D-0002lh-Tc
X-Olympus-MailID-CF: 1EQ54D-0002lh-TcOct13083226WWd
X-Olympus-Virus: Scanned
X-Olympus-OlympusNetMail: Initial processing complete
X-Fingerprint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spamfilter-host: newton.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com";
X-Mail-from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender-Nameserver: dns1.olympus.net dca-ans-01.inet.qwest.net
svl-and-01.inet.qwest.net mx1.olympus.net entiat.olympus.net
X-Sender-host-address: 65.117.224.69
X-Temp-Whitesubject: YES exim
X-Temp-Whitephrase: YES exim
X-Spamprobe: ham-super * 0.0000000 OK
On 10/13/05 8:07 AM, "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to do this verification:
verify = reverse_host_lookup
except I want it to fail only if the lookup returns no host but pass if
it is just misconfigured. Is there a way to do that?
We gave up trying to induce Exim to do lookups the way we wanted, and
instead run a Python daemon to do them for us and return the sorts of
results we want. We didn't like Exim's treatment of various forms of lookup
error.
Exim is essentially unchangeable in this regard at this point...too many
existing configurations.
--John
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
