On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
> 
> > The parsing for rejection lines is a bit of a mess, and fairly
> > unmaintainable. Do you think it would be possible to standardise
> > rejection/refusal log messages? How about something like:
> > 
> > (<ID>|16 Spaces) *< (Connection|MAIL|RCPT|HELO|EHLO|DATA) rejected (from
> > <Address>)?: <Reason> (\(<Detail>\))?
> 
> A humble grovel for having been less than competent in the way I wrote 
> Exim's error messages. I definitely screwed up there.
> 
> I will put your idea on the Wish List, because it's obviously quite a 
> major project to seek them all out and fix them.

This reminds me of the message I once posted, but never received reply
to. When fixing the above issue, it would be good to investigate that
issue as well.

regards,

Marcin
-- 
Marcin Owsiany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
Sometimes the following two lines are logged

2004-07-02 12:34:56 1BgKAH-0001wn-HP SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT 
TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.DOMAIN [1.2.3.4]: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>... User unknown
2004-07-02 12:34:56 1BgKAH-0001wn-HP ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup 
T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 
host mail.DOMAIN [1.2.3.4]: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown

But most of the time, only the second one is logged. I cannot find any
differences between the two cases that would justify differences in
logging.

Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details 
at http://www.exim.org/ ##


--- End Message ---
-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to