On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:18:14 +0100 Jeremy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Chambers wrote: > > Is there a way of doing the opposite of defer_ok? I could use a > > "defer_fail" > > option so that I could treat defer as a hard failure. I would then want to > > check to see if a defer occurred. > > # Technique for explicitly seeing defers; credit [EMAIL PROTECTED] > sverify_callout: > warn set acl_c8 = defer > accept verify = sender/callout=60s,random > set acl_c8 = accept > warn set acl_c8 = deny > deny I must have mis-understood something. As I see it from what happens on my server, unless defer_ok is present, if a verify defers the ACL defers (be it accept or deny). Given that, the above example would not work. Am I mistaken? Phil. --------------------------------------- Phil Chambers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) University of Exeter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
